Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0553
D

Failure to Incorporate Resident Choices into Care Plan

Moscow, Pennsylvania Survey Completed on 09-12-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to honor and incorporate a resident's expressed preferences and choices into the care planning process. Clinical record review showed that the resident, who was cognitively intact and had a history of lobar pneumonia, repeatedly chose not to participate in various aspects of care, including use of a BiPap machine, occupational therapy, nebulizer treatments, blood pressure readings, meals, weights, skin treatments, and bathing. Despite these documented choices, the resident's care plan did not address or reflect these specific preferences or provide tailored interventions to meet the resident's needs related to their decisions to refrain from certain care activities. Facility policy required the development of a comprehensive, person-centered care plan focused on resident choices and abilities, with the goal of maintaining or improving functional abilities and quality of life. However, the care plan in effect at the time of the survey did not accurately represent the resident's expressed choices. This was confirmed in interviews with the Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing, who acknowledged that the resident's preferences were not incorporated into the care plan.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙