Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0842
D

Failure to Accurately Document Resident Consent for Code Status Change

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Survey Completed on 05-29-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to maintain complete and accurate clinical records for one resident. Upon admission, the facility's policy required that residents be provided with information about their right to formulate advance directives, and that any changes in decision-making capacity or code status be communicated and documented appropriately. A resident with diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of the brain, COPD, and chronic kidney disease was admitted and later had a code status change from full code to DNR. The resident was cognitively intact, as indicated by a BIMS score of 14, and was their own responsible party without a legal representative. On the date of the code status change, the POLST form was updated to DNR and signed by the resident's family member, despite the resident being their own responsible party. Progress notes indicated that the family member was involved in discussions and signed documentation, but there was no documentation in the clinical record confirming the resident's agreement to the code status change or to having the family member sign on their behalf. Staff interviews confirmed that the resident verbally agreed and nodded assent, but this was not documented in the clinical record as required by facility policy and professional standards.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙