Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0684
D

Failure to Prevent Elopement for Resident with Dementia

Coal Township, Pennsylvania Survey Completed on 07-14-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide the highest practicable care regarding elopement prevention for a resident with severe cognitive impairment and a known history of wandering and exit-seeking behaviors. The resident, diagnosed with dementia and assessed as an elopement risk, was moved from a locked memory care unit to another nursing unit. Despite care plans and physician orders requiring staff to check the resident's wander guard placement every shift, documentation and staff interviews revealed lapses in monitoring and intervention. The resident exhibited multiple episodes of exit-seeking, including attempts to leave the facility and being found at the main entrance on several occasions. On one occasion, a new dietary aide exited the building, followed by the resident, who stated he was going to the police station. The aide, unsure of protocol, asked a visitor to watch the resident while she sought help. By the time staff responded, the resident had left the parking lot and was found walking down the road, requiring several staff members to return him to the facility. It was noted that the resident did not have a wander guard on at the time of the incident, despite orders for its use and regular checks. These failures to follow established policies and care plans resulted in the resident's elopement and demonstrated a lack of adequate supervision and monitoring.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙