Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0689
J

Failure to Prevent Elopement and Ensure Supervision of Exit-Seeking Residents

Tulsa, Oklahoma Survey Completed on 05-15-2025

Penalty

Fine: $24,255
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide adequate supervision and prevent accident hazards for residents with known exit-seeking behaviors, resulting in two separate incidents of elopement. In the first incident, a resident with a history of wandering, cognitive impairment, and a high risk for elopement was able to leave the courtyard through an unlocked gate that had been propped open by contractors. The resident was observed leaving by another resident, and staff were notified and able to redirect the resident back into the building. Prior assessments and care plans had identified the resident's risk for elopement and included interventions such as staff education, regular checks, and redirection, but these measures were not effectively implemented to prevent the resident from exiting the secured area. In the second incident, another resident with a traumatic brain injury, aphasia, depression, and severe cognitive impairment was found missing after a representative inquired about their whereabouts. Staff were unaware the resident was missing until notified, and the resident was found minutes later in the facility's independent living parking lot. The resident had exited the courtyard through a gate, which was observed to have an unlocked key lock, and traversed through unsecured areas leading to the parking lot. Prior documentation indicated the resident had exhibited wandering and exit-seeking behaviors, including attempts to leave the facility and statements about needing to go elsewhere, but the facility did not ensure the courtyard gates were secured or that staff were monitoring the resident closely enough to prevent elopement. Observations during the survey revealed that multiple gates in the courtyard and patio areas were either unlocked or had dummy locks, allowing residents to exit the secured areas without staff intervention. Staff interviews confirmed that they were aware of the residents' exit-seeking behaviors but did not implement one-on-one supervision or other effective interventions until after the elopement incidents occurred. The facility's failure to secure the environment and provide adequate supervision directly contributed to the residents' ability to leave the premises unsupervised.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙