Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0684
G

Failure to Notify Provider and Respond to Family Requests Regarding Change in Condition

Twinsburg, Ohio Survey Completed on 06-25-2025

Penalty

Fine: $108,855
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that a Nurse Practitioner (NP) or physician was contacted when the family of a resident with multiple complex medical conditions, including sepsis, acute respiratory failure, diabetes, dementia, and recent hospitalizations, repeatedly requested to speak with one of them. The resident, who had severely impaired cognition, was reported by her daughter to be crying, miserable, and not acting like herself. Despite the family's multiple requests throughout the day for NP or physician contact due to concerns about the resident's change in condition and history of sepsis, there was no documented evidence that the NP or physician was contacted in a timely manner. The agency nurse responded dismissively to the family's requests and attempted to deter them from seeking hospital evaluation, even as the family expressed fear of a recurring infection. It was only after the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) became involved later in the evening that the NP on call was contacted and an order was obtained to send the resident to the emergency room. Documentation and interviews confirmed that the family had made several requests to speak with a provider and to have the resident evaluated, but these requests were not acted upon promptly. The deficiency was identified through record review and interviews, which revealed a lack of appropriate response to the family's concerns and failure to follow through with provider notification as required.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙