Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0686
D

Failure to Ensure Wound Treatment Orders and Documentation for Pressure Ulcer Prevention

Zanesville, Ohio Survey Completed on 07-12-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when the facility failed to ensure that wound treatment orders were in place for a resident with multiple medical conditions, including surgical aftercare, heart disease, respiratory failure, chronic kidney disease, and diabetes. The resident was admitted with deep tissue injuries (DTIs) to the bilateral buttocks, which were documented as dark reddish purple, hard areas. Although the care plan included the application of barrier cream after each incontinent episode, and physician orders were in place for pressure relief interventions, there was no documented evidence that protective cream was applied to the affected areas from the time of admission until several days later. Further review revealed that an order for protective cream to the bilateral buttocks was not obtained until after the resident developed Moisture Associated Skin Damage (MASD). The Treatment Administration Record did not show documentation of barrier cream application prior to this order, and the DON confirmed that there was no documentation or order for barrier cream until after MASD was identified. Facility policy required measures to maintain skin integrity and prevent pressure ulcers, but these were not consistently implemented for this resident.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙