Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0756
D

Failure to Document Rationale for Not Reducing Psychotropic Medication

Delaware, Ohio Survey Completed on 05-28-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when the facility failed to ensure that a rationale was documented for not attempting a gradual dose reduction (GDR) of psychotropic medications for a resident. The resident, who had diagnoses including major depressive disorder, chronic kidney disease, urinary retention, and anxiety disorder, was receiving Zoloft, mirtazapine, and hydroxyzine. The consulting pharmacist recommended a GDR or, if not appropriate, required a documented explanation as to why a GDR would be detrimental. The physician reviewed and signed the pharmacy recommendations, indicating that a GDR was contraindicated, but did not provide any rationale for this decision. This omission was confirmed during an interview with the DON. Facility policy required that if a physician declined a pharmacist's recommendation, an explanation should be documented in the medical record, and if not, the DON should be notified and the issue brought to the QAPI committee. In this case, the required rationale was not documented, resulting in noncompliance with facility policy and regulatory expectations.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙