Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0684
D

Failure to Follow Up on Critically Low Potassium Level Prior to Discharge

Springfield, Ohio Survey Completed on 08-26-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when the facility failed to ensure adequate follow-up for a critically low potassium laboratory result for a resident with multiple diagnoses, including bacterial pneumonia, type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and obesity. The resident was admitted and later discharged without appropriate re-evaluation of a critical potassium level. Medical record review showed that the resident's potassium was critically low at 2.5 mEq/L, and although medication adjustments were made, there was no evidence that the potassium level was re-checked prior to discharge. The discharge paperwork did not include instructions for follow-up laboratory testing. Interviews with facility staff and the nurse practitioner revealed that the nurse practitioner had ordered a repeat metabolic panel to monitor the potassium level, but was not informed of the resident's impending discharge. The resident and family were only notified of the critical potassium level on the day of discharge, at which point they were instructed to go to the hospital. Hospital records confirmed the resident was admitted for hypokalemia with a persistently low potassium level. The facility's policy required a discharge summary and post-discharge plan, but these were not adequately implemented in this case.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙