Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0689
D

Resident Elopement Due to Inaudible Door Alarm and Inadequate Supervision

Cincinnati, Ohio Survey Completed on 05-14-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when a resident with a history of Alzheimer's disease, psychotic disorder, and Parkinson's disease, who was assessed as being at risk for elopement due to wandering behaviors and cognitive impairment, exited the facility through an alarmed door without staff knowledge. The resident was independently mobile with a walker and required supervision for activities of daily living. The care plan identified the risk for elopement and included interventions such as redirection and structured activities, but these were not sufficient to prevent the incident. On the day of the event, two aides were present on the unit and were unaware of the resident's elopement risk. The door alarm, which was intended to alert staff to unauthorized exits, was not loud enough to be heard from the nurses' station where the aides were located. The aides only became aware of the resident's exit after being notified by staff from another unit, who had been contacted by the police upon finding the resident outside. Facility staff interviews and observations confirmed that the alarm was not audible from the nurses' station and that maintenance had not been asked to adjust the alarm volume following the incident.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙