Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0842
E

Inaccurate Bathing Documentation and Recordkeeping

Salem, Ohio Survey Completed on 08-25-2025

Penalty

89 days payment denial
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure the accuracy of medical records regarding bathing for four residents reviewed for provision of showers. In several cases, there were discrepancies between the electronic health record (EHR) and the physical shower sheets or body/skin inspection forms. For example, one resident was documented in the EHR as not available for showers due to being hospitalized, yet shower sheets indicated that showers and skin assessments were completed during the same period. Another resident's EHR noted that showers were not attempted due to medical or safety concerns, while the shower sheets recorded that the resident refused showers, despite a separate area in the EHR to indicate refusals. Additionally, a resident reported that showers were not always offered according to the schedule, sometimes due to staffing issues. Other residents had similar inconsistencies, such as documentation in the EHR stating that showers were not attempted due to environmental limitations, while shower sheets indicated that showers were accepted on those dates. These discrepancies were identified during a complaint investigation and were confirmed through interviews with the Director of Nursing, who acknowledged the inconsistencies and the need for staff education on proper documentation. The affected residents had complex medical and psychiatric diagnoses and were dependent on staff for bathing and other activities of daily living.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙