Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0558
D

Failure to Ensure Timely Call Light Response for Dependent Residents

Delaware, Ohio Survey Completed on 08-28-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure timely response to call lights for two residents who required significant assistance with care. One resident, admitted with respiratory failure, vent dependence, dysphagia, muscle weakness, and diabetes, was observed to have activated her call light for incontinence care and waited 49 minutes before care was provided. During this period, staff entered the room only to deliver a meal tray, and the CNA responsible was unaware of the request, stating she did not hear the call light or radio due to assisting elsewhere. The Assistant Director of Nursing acknowledged the delay and stated there was no specific expectation for call light response time. The Director of Nursing also confirmed the facility policy was vague and agreed the wait time was excessive. Another resident, dependent on staff for eating and with diagnoses including acute chronic respiratory failure and vent dependence, activated her call light to request respiratory therapy and waited 45 minutes before being seen. The resident expressed uncertainty about when care would be provided. Review of call light audits over a two-month period showed multiple instances where response times exceeded 10 minutes, with the longest being 20 minutes. Staff interviews revealed inconsistent understanding of expected response times, and the facility's policy only stated that staff should strive to answer call lights promptly, without specifying a timeframe.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙