Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0610
D

Failure to Immediately Protect Resident Following Allegation of Staff-to-Resident Abuse

Cincinnati, Ohio Survey Completed on 06-14-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to immediately protect a resident from alleged staff-to-resident physical abuse after the resident reported that staff were rough during repositioning. The resident, who had diagnoses including rheumatoid arthritis, chronic pain syndrome, and fibromyalgia, and was cognitively intact, reported to the DON that night shift staff were rough with them. The DON treated the report as a grievance related to care rather than an abuse allegation, and did not immediately suspend the staff involved or initiate an abuse investigation at that time. The staff members identified in the allegation continued to work in the facility and were not suspended until several days later, after the hospital notified the facility of the abuse allegation made by the resident's family. Facility policy required immediate action to protect residents from harm and to suspend alleged perpetrators pending investigation. Despite this, the staff members named in the allegation continued to work in the facility between the initial report and the later notification from the hospital, although they did not work directly with the resident during that period. The deficiency was identified through staff interviews, record reviews, and policy review, and was found to affect one resident reviewed for abuse.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙