Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0657
D

Failure to Provide Resident-Centered Activity Care Plan

Springfield, Ohio Survey Completed on 05-20-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Facility staff failed to ensure that the activity care plan for a resident was appropriately individualized and resident-centered. The resident, who had diagnoses including senile degeneration of the brain, unspecified psychosis, anxiety, and spinal stenosis, was noted to be cognitively impaired with a BIMS score of 00 and was rarely understood. Despite documented interests in religious activities, baking, country music, television, movies, and dogs, the care plan only included generic interventions for one-on-one activities and was not updated to reflect the resident's preferences or cognitive decline. Activity assessments indicated unchanged preferences, but the care plan did not incorporate specific or meaningful activity options tailored to the resident's needs. Record review showed that the resident was only offered a limited number of one-on-one visits in recent months, with no visits documented in the previous ten days. Observations on multiple dates revealed the resident remained in her room, with no lights, television, or music, and had not participated in any activities or been encouraged by staff to do so. Staff interviews confirmed that activity care plans were not updated to reflect the resident's interests or cognitive status, and the facility's policy required care plans to include resident needs and interests.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙