Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0690
D

Delayed Incontinence Care Due to Untimely Call Light Response

Parma, Ohio Survey Completed on 07-29-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when a resident with multiple medical conditions, including type II diabetes, chronic heart failure, hypertension, and bowel incontinence, did not receive timely incontinence care. The resident was dependent on staff for toileting and had an indwelling suprapubic catheter. The care plan required staff to check for continence, offer toileting assistance, and provide incontinence care with protective barriers after each episode. On the day of the incident, the resident's call light was on for approximately 40 minutes before any staff entered the room, despite multiple staff passing by. When a nurse entered, she administered medication but did not provide incontinence care, instead stating she would notify the aide. The resident reported waiting all morning for care and expressed dissatisfaction with the response. Subsequent interviews with staff confirmed that call lights should be answered within ten minutes, and the delay was acknowledged as excessive. The assigned CNA stated she was busy assisting other residents and had not yet attended to the resident in question, but did not feel the facility was short-staffed. The LPN and interim DON both verified that the response time was not appropriate and that any staff member could answer a call light to assist residents. The deficiency was identified through record review, observation, and interviews, and was cited as a failure to meet the resident's incontinence care needs in a timely manner.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙