Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0565
C

Failure to Address Resident Council Concerns in a Timely Manner

Wintersville, Ohio Survey Completed on 06-02-2025

Penalty

Fine: $148,85052 days payment denial
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to address concerns raised by the Resident Council in a timely manner, as evidenced by a review of Resident Council meeting minutes, policy documents, and staff and resident interviews. Concerns about call light wait times were repeatedly mentioned in several meetings, and issues with ice water were also raised. However, the minutes did not document any resolutions to these concerns, and the facility's policy requiring concerns to be documented, distributed to department heads, and followed up through the Resident Grievance Procedure was not followed. Staff interviews confirmed that concern forms were not used, concerns were not formally presented to department heads, and there was no process to communicate resolutions back to the Resident Council. A resident reported ongoing issues with excessive call light wait times, including a specific instance of a two-hour wait. The Director of Activities, who presides over Resident Council meetings, acknowledged that resolutions to concerns were not brought back to the Council. The Social Service Designee maintained a separate concern log for other issues but did not handle Resident Council concerns. The Administrator confirmed there was no documentation of complaint resolution for Resident Council issues, and the last call light audit was conducted prior to the most recent meeting where call light concerns were still being reported. This deficiency was identified during an investigation under a specific complaint number and had the potential to affect all residents in the facility.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙