Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0686
G

Failure to Provide Timely Pressure Ulcer Assessment and Prevention

Perrysburg, Ohio Survey Completed on 05-15-2025

Penalty

8 days payment denial
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide timely assessment, monitoring, and interventions to prevent the development of a pressure ulcer in a resident who was assessed at moderate risk for pressure ulcer development. The resident was admitted with multiple complex medical conditions, including a stage four sacral pressure ulcer, diabetes mellitus type II, congestive heart failure, and vascular ulcers. The care plan included interventions such as skin checks each shift, offloading of heels, use of heel suspension boots, and pressure redistribution mattresses. However, there was no documented evidence that skin checks were completed each shift as required by the care plan. Despite the presence of heel protector boots, the resident developed a new, in-house acquired unstageable pressure ulcer on the left lateral heel. The wound was first noted as a blister and later progressed to a stage three pressure ulcer requiring surgical debridement and ongoing wound care. There was no documentation of ongoing assessments to determine the causative factors of the wound or to evaluate the need for changes in pressure reduction interventions. Staff interviews confirmed that no further evaluation occurred to determine the origin of the wound, and there was no evidence that the skin under the offloading boots was assessed each shift. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the required skin assessments were not documented, and the resident was not assessed as high risk for pressure ulcer development despite significant risk factors and existing wounds. The facility's clinical protocol required monitoring and physician guidance when wounds were not healing or new wounds developed, but this was not followed in the case of this resident.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙