Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0656
D

Care Plan Lacked Comprehensive Psychosocial Interventions for Resident Behaviors

Newark, Ohio Survey Completed on 08-21-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that a resident's care plan included comprehensive psychosocial interventions to address identified inappropriate behaviors. Specifically, a resident with diagnoses of depression, anxiety disorder, hypertension, and insomnia was known to make inappropriate and sexual comments to staff. Although the care plan included interventions such as one-on-one supervision, periodic safety checks, referral to psychiatric services as needed, and staff monitoring, it did not address the resident's expressed desire to form a relationship with another cognitively impaired resident or the facility's actions to restrict contact between the two residents. Interviews revealed that the resident was unhappy with the restrictions placed on his interactions with the other resident, which included supervised visits or visits behind glass. The facility had informed the other resident's POA, who requested no contact, and staff were instructed to keep the residents apart. However, these current concerns and interventions were not documented in the resident's care plan, as confirmed by the Administrator. This omission resulted in a deficiency related to the development and implementation of a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙