Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0688
D

Failure to Provide Recommended Orthopedic Boot for Resident with Limited Mobility

Columbus, Ohio Survey Completed on 05-29-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to follow podiatry recommendations for a resident with significant mobility limitations and a severe right foot deformity. The resident, who had diagnoses including right foot talipes equinovarus, hemiplegia, muscle weakness, and limited ambulation, was dependent on a manual wheelchair and had a care plan indicating the need for appropriate mobility devices and interventions. The care plan also noted the resident's risk for pressure areas and skin tears, and included a podiatry recommendation for new shoes due to worn-out footwear. Despite this, the resident's orthopedic boot was observed to be in poor condition, with a worn-down bottom, a hole in the heel, and visible dirt and wear. Interviews with staff confirmed that the resident rarely wore the orthopedic boot except for outside appointments, and the DON acknowledged that the podiatrist's recommendation for a new boot had not been followed up on. The resident expressed a desire for a new orthopedic boot to assist with foot positioning and stated he would wear it regularly if provided. The failure to obtain and provide the recommended orthopedic boot constituted a deficiency in maintaining and improving the resident's range of motion and mobility as required.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙