Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
E

Inaccurate MDS Assessments and Documentation Errors

Mayfield Heights, Ohio Survey Completed on 05-29-2025

Penalty

Fine: $173,90029 days payment denial
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessments were completed accurately for five residents. In one case, a resident was incorrectly documented as having a Stage III pressure ulcer present on admission, despite medical records and staff interviews confirming that no such ulcer was present at that time. Another resident was inaccurately assessed as being dependent on staff for activities of daily living, when nursing progress notes indicated the resident was independent or only required supervision for most tasks. A third resident's MDS assessment underreported the number of insulin injections received, stating only one injection in the look-back period when medication records showed daily administration. For another resident, the MDS inaccurately reflected severe cognitive impairment and enteral feeding compliance, despite multiple staff interviews and observations revealing the resident refused enteral feedings, consumed nutrition orally against orders, and was not receiving the documented amounts via the feeding tube. The staff responsible for the assessment did not document refusals or update the MDS to reflect the resident's actual intake and behavior. Additionally, a resident with a documented pressure wound and high risk for pressure sores was not accurately represented in the MDS, which failed to note the presence of the wound or the interventions in place. Staff interviews confirmed the inaccuracies in the assessments and a lack of awareness among clinical leadership regarding the residents' actual conditions and care needs. These findings demonstrate a pattern of incomplete or incorrect MDS documentation based on inconsistent or unverified information from the medical record and staff observations.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙