Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0698
D

Failure to Ensure Consistent Communication and Documentation for Dialysis Care

Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio Survey Completed on 06-12-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure consistent and effective communication and collaboration with the dialysis center for a resident requiring dialysis services. The resident, who had end stage renal disease and was cognitively intact, did not consistently have pre-assessment forms completed by the facility prior to dialysis appointments, with several dates missing documentation. Additionally, the facility did not reliably send paperwork with the resident to the dialysis center, and the dialysis center did not consistently send communication back with the resident after treatments. Interviews with staff revealed uncertainty about what paperwork was being sent or received, and documentation from the dialysis center was rarely uploaded into the resident's medical record. Further investigation showed that the only communication sheet from the dialysis center uploaded into the medical record was from a single date, despite multiple treatments occurring during the review period. Staff interviews confirmed that communication forms from the dialysis center were rarely received, and when not received, staff often assumed there were no changes in the resident's condition. The facility's policy required comprehensive monitoring and exchange of information with the dialysis center, but this was not consistently followed, resulting in a lack of person-centered care and failure to meet professional standards of practice for dialysis services.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙