Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0658
E

Failure to Follow Professional Standards in Insulin Administration and Blood Glucose Monitoring

Dunseith, North Dakota Survey Completed on 05-29-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Facility staff failed to follow professional standards of practice during insulin administration for four residents observed. Specifically, nurses were seen priming insulin pens incorrectly, either with the needle cap on or while holding the pen downward, contrary to facility policy which requires the needle cap to be off and the pen to be held upright during priming. These observations were confirmed by an administrative nurse who stated the expected procedure was not followed. Additionally, for one resident with Type 2 diabetes mellitus, staff did not notify the physician when blood glucose readings were outside the parameters set by the physician's order. The resident's medical record showed multiple instances of blood sugar levels below 100 mg/dL and above 450 mg/dL, but there was no documentation that the physician was informed as required by facility policy. This was acknowledged by an administrative nurse during interview.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙