Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0842
D

Inaccurate Documentation of Blood Pressure Medication Administration

Wilmington, North Carolina Survey Completed on 05-30-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to maintain a complete and accurate medication administration record for a resident with a diagnosis of high blood pressure. Physician orders specified that Metoprolol Succinate 25 mg should be held if the resident's systolic blood pressure (SBP) was less than 110 mm/Hg. However, review of the medication administration records for April and May 2025 showed that the medication was documented as given on several occasions when the recorded SBP was below the specified threshold. Specifically, on three separate dates, the medication was signed off as administered despite SBP readings of 105/60 mm/Hg, 105/58 mm/Hg, and 108/64 mm/Hg, all of which were below the hold parameter. Interviews with the involved nursing staff and medication aide revealed that these were documentation errors. Staff admitted to inaccurately recording that the medication was given when it should have been documented as held, or to recording the wrong blood pressure value. The nurse practitioner and Director of Nursing both stated that they expect accurate documentation of medication administration, as this information is relied upon for clinical decision-making and ongoing care.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙