Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0757
D

Failure to Hold Blood Pressure Medication per Physician Parameters

Wilmington, North Carolina Survey Completed on 05-30-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Nursing staff failed to follow physician-ordered parameters for administering a blood pressure medication to a resident with a history of hypertension and episodes of low blood pressure. The physician's order specified that Metoprolol Succinate 25 mg should be held if the resident's systolic blood pressure (SBP) was less than 110 mm/Hg. Despite this, medication administration records showed that the medication was given on multiple occasions when the resident's SBP was below the ordered threshold. Specific instances included administration when SBP readings were 101, 105, 93, 103, 97, and 109 mm/Hg, all of which were below the 110 mm/Hg parameter set by the physician. Interviews with nursing staff revealed a lack of awareness or misunderstanding of the specific hold parameters, with one nurse incorrectly recalling the threshold as 100 mm/Hg and another unable to explain why the medication was administered outside the parameters. The nurse practitioner and Director of Nursing both confirmed that the medication should not have been given when the SBP was below 110 mm/Hg, as per the physician's order. The failure to adhere to the medication hold parameters resulted in the resident receiving unnecessary doses of blood pressure medication.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙