Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
B

Inaccurate MDS Coding for Two Residents

Ramseur, North Carolina Survey Completed on 08-01-2025

Penalty

Fine: $18,000
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to accurately code Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for two residents. For one resident with schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, physician orders indicated a monthly intramuscular injection of Haloperidol, an antipsychotic medication, which was administered as ordered in June and July. However, the quarterly MDS assessment did not reflect the use of antipsychotic medications during the look-back period. For another resident with obesity, physician orders specified weekly subcutaneous injections of semaglutide for weight loss, which were administered as ordered. The quarterly MDS assessment for this resident incorrectly documented the administration of insulin, despite no physician orders or evidence of insulin administration. Interviews with the MDS coordinator confirmed the inaccuracies in the MDS assessments for both residents. The assessments in question were completed by another MDS nurse, who was unavailable for interview. The facility administrator was unaware of the reasons for the incorrect coding and stated an expectation for all MDS assessments to be accurate.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙