Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0578
D

Failure to Maintain Consistent Advance Directive Documentation

Raleigh, North Carolina Survey Completed on 08-21-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when the facility failed to maintain accurate and consistent documentation of a resident's advance directive and code status throughout the medical record. The resident, who was cognitively intact and had diagnoses including chronic kidney disease and hypertension, was admitted with a code status of do not resuscitate (DNR) indicated in the electronic medical record profile. However, a review of the advanced care planning notes revealed the absence of an advance directive, and a Medical Orders for Scope of Treatment (MOST) form in the record stated 'attempt CPR' and 'full scope of treatment.' Additionally, there was no physician's order addressing the resident's code status. Staff interviews confirmed the inconsistency, with the Social Worker and Director of Nursing both unable to explain the discrepancy between the electronic record and the MOST form. The resident herself stated her wish to have a DNR code status, but the documentation in her medical record did not consistently reflect this preference. The deficiency was identified through record review and staff interviews, highlighting a lack of accurate and unified documentation regarding the resident's advance directive and code status.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙