Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0838
F

Deficient Facility Assessment and Inaccurate Staffing Plan

Rich Square, North Carolina Survey Completed on 07-02-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to conduct and document a comprehensive facility-wide assessment as required. The assessment did not involve all necessary parties in its development, specifically lacking input from direct care staff, residents, resident representatives, and family members. Additionally, the assessment listed outdated administrative personnel, including a former Administrator, Medical Director, and Social Worker, rather than the current staff. The staffing plan included in the assessment only provided the desired number of full-time equivalent (FTE) nurses and CNAs, but did not address specific staffing needs for each shift, weekends, or account for changes in the resident population. The staff type and position list was also inaccurate, listing a Staff Development Coordinator (SDC) position that did not exist at the facility. Further, the facility assessment did not specify the required skills and competencies for licensed nursing staff and CNAs. During an interview, the current Administrator confirmed she had not reviewed or updated the facility assessment since her employment began and acknowledged the inaccuracies in the staff position list. No additional documentation regarding the facility assessment was provided at the time of the survey exit. These deficiencies had the potential to affect all 54 residents in the facility.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙