Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0880
D

Failure to Implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions During High-Risk Resident Care

Wilmington, North Carolina Survey Completed on 05-15-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to implement its infection control policy and procedures for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) during direct care activities for residents with high-risk conditions. In one instance, a nurse provided care to a resident with a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line by donning gloves but not a gown, and did not change gloves after touching items on the bedside table before proceeding with intravenous care. The nurse was unaware that a gown was required for PICC line care and did not realize gloves should be changed after touching potentially contaminated surfaces. The resident in question was receiving intravenous antibiotics for endocarditis and had a PICC line, which is considered an invasive device requiring EBP according to facility policy. Additionally, two nursing assistants provided turning and repositioning care to another resident who was on EBP due to a gastrostomy tube and a wound positive for MRSA, without wearing gloves or gowns. The nursing assistants did not perform hand hygiene before entering the room and believed that repositioning a resident using a draw sheet did not require personal protective equipment (PPE). Both staff members stated they had received training on EBP but found the requirements confusing, particularly regarding which activities necessitated PPE. Observations confirmed that signage indicating EBP requirements was present outside the resident's room, specifying the need for gown and gloves during high-contact care activities, including handling bed linens and device care. Interviews with facility leadership, including the Assistant Director of Nursing, Unit Manager, Wound Care Nurse, Infection Preventionist, and Director of Nursing, revealed inconsistent understanding and implementation of EBP. While leadership confirmed that residents with invasive devices or wounds should be on EBP and that PPE is required for high-contact care activities, there was a lack of clarity regarding the assignment of precautions and verification of staff competency. The Infection Preventionist and Wound Care Nurse both indicated that the resident with the PICC line should have been on EBP, but there was no signage or consistent application of precautions for this resident.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙