Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
D

Inaccurate Coding of MDS Assessments for Discharge and Dialysis

Nebo, North Carolina Survey Completed on 06-24-2025

Penalty

Fine: $296,905
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure accurate coding of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for two residents. One resident, who was discharged from the facility, had a progress note indicating discharge home with a friend and receipt of medications, but the discharge MDS assessment incorrectly documented discharge to a short-term general hospital. This miscoding was identified during staff interviews, where it was acknowledged as a keying error. Another resident with end-stage kidney disease and an active order for hemodialysis three times weekly was not coded for dialysis on the quarterly MDS assessment. The MDS Coordinator explained that the assessment was completed by a remote nurse in training, who had the correct information but failed to code dialysis on the assessment due to oversight. Interviews with facility leadership confirmed that MDS assessments are expected to accurately reflect residents' care needs.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙