Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
E

Inaccurate MDS Coding for Medications, PASRR Status, Range of Motion, and Admission Source

Reidsville, North Carolina Survey Completed on 06-05-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for multiple residents in several key areas, resulting in deficiencies. For one resident with diabetes and cirrhosis, the MDS did not reflect the administration of an antibiotic (rifaximin) during the 7-day look-back period, despite documentation in the Medication Administration Record and confirmation by MDS staff that the medication was given. Another resident who was hospitalized for sepsis and re-entered the facility was incorrectly coded as having entered from another nursing home, rather than from a hospital, due to reliance on pre-populated fields and lack of verification by the Social Service Director. A resident with schizoaffective disorder and a PASRR Level II determination was not accurately coded on the MDS to reflect this status, even though the care plan and PASRR documentation confirmed the requirement for specialized services. The MDS nurse acknowledged the omission, attributing it to assessments being completed by remote staff. Additionally, a resident with dementia and contractures was incorrectly coded as having no upper extremity impairment, despite care plan documentation and direct observation of contractures in the left hand and wrist. The MDS nurse admitted this was an oversight, and the administrator confirmed the coding error regarding range of motion. These inaccuracies were identified through staff interviews, record reviews, and direct observation, affecting four out of twenty-one residents whose MDS assessments were reviewed. The deficiencies involved failure to accurately document antibiotic use, PASRR Level II status, range of motion impairment, and the correct discharge location prior to admission or re-entry, as required by regulatory standards.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙