Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0880
D

Failure to Implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions During Wound Care

Banner Elk, North Carolina Survey Completed on 08-06-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to implement its infection control policy regarding Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for a resident with a pressure ulcer. According to the facility's policy, EBP, including the use of gowns and gloves, should be used during high-contact care activities for residents with chronic wounds, such as pressure ulcers. During an observation, a Treatment Nurse and a Nurse Aide provided wound care to a resident with an unstageable pressure ulcer without donning gowns, and there was no signage or PPE supplies outside the resident's room to indicate EBP was required. The staff performed hand hygiene and changed gloves multiple times during the procedure but did not use gowns as required by policy. Interviews with the involved staff revealed that the Treatment Nurse did not believe EBP was necessary due to the absence of significant wound drainage, and the Nurse Aide assumed EBP was not needed because there was no signage. The Infection Preventionist acknowledged that the resident should have been placed on EBP when the pressure ulcer was identified, attributing the failure to a miscommunication with the Treatment Nurse. The Director of Nursing also confirmed that EBP should have been implemented when the pressure ulcer was first identified, but it was delayed due to uncertainty about the wound's status and a lapse in communication.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙