Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0690
D

Failure to Obtain Physician Order for Indwelling Urinary Catheter

Elizabeth City, North Carolina Survey Completed on 05-21-2025

Penalty

Fine: $16,720
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when the facility failed to obtain a physician order for the use and care of an indwelling urinary catheter for a resident who was readmitted with a history of neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder and a spinal fracture. The resident had an indwelling urinary catheter in place during a recent hospital stay and at the time of discharge, and the care plan included interventions for catheter management. However, upon review of the facility's records, there was no physician order for the indwelling urinary catheter or its care after readmission. Interviews with nursing staff revealed confusion and miscommunication regarding responsibility for reactivating or entering the necessary orders for the catheter. One nurse believed the oncoming nurse would reactivate the orders, while the other nurse thought it was the first nurse's responsibility. Both the Medical Director and the DON confirmed that a physician order was required for the catheter, and the omission was acknowledged as an oversight during the facility's clinical morning meeting. The administrator also confirmed that nursing was responsible for ensuring physician orders were in place for catheter care.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙