Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0640
B

Failure to Timely Transmit MDS Assessments

Concord, North Carolina Survey Completed on 06-27-2025

Penalty

Fine: $123,76030 days payment denial
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to transmit Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments to the State within the required 14-day period for four out of five residents reviewed. Specifically, quarterly and significant change MDS assessments for several residents were not transmitted until well after the assessment reference dates, as evidenced by the MDS Submission Reports. For example, one resident's quarterly MDS assessment was not transmitted until nearly a month after the assessment reference date, and another resident's significant change assessment was transmitted 15 days after the assessment reference date. These delays were confirmed through record reviews and staff interviews. Interviews with facility staff revealed that the late transmissions were due to turnover in the MDS staff, with the previous MDS Coordinator not completing transmissions in a timely manner. The facility had recently hired a new MDS Coordinator, but the late transmissions occurred during the period of staff transition. The Administrator acknowledged that the assessments should have been transmitted within the required timeframe.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙