Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0687
D

Failure to Provide Ordered Foot Care Treatment

Concord, North Carolina Survey Completed on 08-07-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when the facility failed to provide foot care treatment as ordered by a podiatrist for a resident with a history of stroke and severe cognitive impairment. The podiatrist's note documented a chronic problem with dry skin (xerosis) and included an order for daily application of moisturizing cream to both feet, avoiding the area between the toes, for three months. However, this order was not transcribed into the resident's physician orders or treatment record, and no staff were aware of the order. Observations revealed the resident's feet were very dry with thick, flakey dead skin. Interviews with nursing staff, nursing assistants, the unit manager, and the DON confirmed that none were aware of the podiatrist's order, and the moisturizing cream had not been applied. The unit manager explained that consultant notes were typically reviewed for orders, but in this case, the podiatry note was sent directly to medical records for scanning and was not reviewed. The DON and administrator both stated that consultant notes should be reviewed for orders and entered into the electronic document system, but this process was not followed for the podiatrist's order.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙