Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0578
D

Failure to Maintain Accurate Code Status Documentation

Lillington, North Carolina Survey Completed on 07-24-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to maintain accurate and consistent code status information for a resident with a history of malignant neoplasm of the uterus, anxiety, depression, and non-Alzheimer's dementia. Upon readmission, the resident had a physician's order for Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) status, and the resident's representative confirmed that this status had been in place since a hospital stay in January and had not changed. However, the resident's care plan was updated to indicate full code status, which conflicted with the physician's order and the representative's statements. Interviews with staff revealed that code status information was obtained from admission orders and hospital records, and was supposed to be reviewed with the resident or responsible party. The MDS nurse was responsible for updating the care plan, and the DON stated that code status was clarified on admission and during care plan meetings. Despite these procedures, the code status for the resident was missing from the red code status binder at the nurses' station, and staff relied on this binder to verify code status in emergencies. This inconsistency in documentation and communication led to the deficiency.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙