Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
D

Failure to Accurately Code MDS Assessment for Visual Impairment

Greensboro, North Carolina Survey Completed on 07-08-2025

Penalty

Fine: $189,42535 days payment denial
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment in the area of vision for a resident with a history of cardiac arrhythmia, dementia, and essential hypertension. The resident's electronic medical record included an ophthalmology consultation that documented bilateral cataracts and blurred vision, with cataract surgeries scheduled but delayed due to a hospital stay. Despite this, both the Significant Change in Status and the most recent MDS assessments completed by two different MDS nurses indicated the resident had adequate vision and corrective lenses, with no mention of visual impairment or cataracts in the care plan. Interviews with the resident confirmed ongoing difficulty with vision, and staff interviews revealed that the MDS nurses were unaware of the ophthalmology findings at the time of assessment. Both nurses acknowledged that the resident should have been coded for visual impairment based on the available medical information. The administrator also confirmed that the MDS assessments should have accurately reflected the resident's medical condition.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙