Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0584
D

Failure to Safeguard Resident's Personal Property

Croton On Hudson, New York Survey Completed on 08-15-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency was identified when a resident with a history of cerebral infarction and schizoaffective disorder, who was moderately cognitively impaired, reported that their personal cell phone went missing while being charged during their stay. The facility's policy required that each resident be offered a locked drawer or equivalent with a key for small valuables, and that an inventory of personal belongings be maintained. However, there was no documented evidence that the resident's cell phone was protected from loss or theft at the time of the incident. The Social Work note confirmed the missing phone and communication with the resident's family, but did not indicate that appropriate safeguards were in place. Interviews with facility staff revealed inconsistent practices regarding the safeguarding of residents' valuables. The Director of Social Work stated that valuables could be kept in the Social Work Office or in a lockable dresser drawer, but was unaware if the resident had been offered such options. Nursing staff indicated that lockable drawers were available and could be provided by the Maintenance Department if needed, with keys held by either the resident or licensed nurses. The Administrator confirmed that residents' possessions were documented on an inventory checklist and that lockable drawers were available, but could not recall details about the missing cell phone. There was no evidence that the required protections for the resident's property were implemented in this case.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙