Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0689
D

Failure to Evaluate and Document Fall Prevention Interventions for High-Risk Resident

Far Rockaway, New York Survey Completed on 05-20-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when the facility failed to ensure that a resident at risk for falls received adequate supervision and that accident hazards were minimized. The resident, who had severe cognitive impairment, was non-ambulatory, and required assistance for toileting and bed mobility, was found on the floor next to their bed with bleeding from the nostrils and a hematoma to the forehead. The incident took place during morning rounds, and the resident was subsequently transferred to the hospital, where a nasal bone fracture was diagnosed. The resident had a documented history of multiple falls, and their care plan included interventions such as frequent monitoring, keeping the bed in the lowest position, and ensuring the call bell was within reach. Despite these interventions, the facility did not provide documented evidence that the effectiveness of the implemented interventions was evaluated after each fall. The care plan and fall risk assessments were updated following each incident, but the interventions remained largely unchanged, and there was no documentation of ongoing monitoring frequency beyond the initial 48-hour post-fall period. Staff interviews confirmed that monitoring was performed every 30 minutes for 48 hours after a fall, but after this period, the frequency of monitoring was not clearly documented, and there was no evidence of reassessment or adjustment of interventions based on the resident's ongoing risk. The facility's fall risk assessment tool did not identify the level of fall risk, only the risk factors, and there was no documentation that the resident's fall risk was reassessed or that interventions were modified in response to repeated incidents. Staff reported that the resident was kept in a high-visibility area when out of bed and that frequent rounds were made, but these actions were not consistently documented. The lack of evaluation of intervention effectiveness and insufficient documentation of monitoring frequency contributed to the deficiency in providing adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙