Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0561
D

Failure to Honor Resident's Right to Visitation

Middletown, New York Survey Completed on 07-03-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure a resident's right to receive visitors of their choosing at the time of their choosing, as required by facility policy and regulation. The deficiency involved a resident with diagnoses including adult failure to thrive, hypertension, and interstitial lung disease, who was noted to have severely impaired cognition. Despite the resident expressing a desire to see their friend, the facility restricted the friend's visitation based on concerns raised by a family member and the Administrator regarding the resident's finances. The family member did not hold legal authority such as health care proxy, guardianship, or power of attorney. The facility communicated visitation limitations to the friend, who did not express concerns at that time. Staff interviews and documentation revealed that the resident consistently expressed a wish to see their friend and was upset about the visitation restrictions. The Administrator acknowledged restricting the friend's visits, citing concerns about the resident's cognitive status and potential financial exploitation, and offered supervised visits, which were declined by the friend. Despite a temporary guardian being appointed by court order to safeguard the resident's assets and determine care providers, the facility continued to restrict visitation, resulting in the resident being unable to see their friend as desired.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙