Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0550
D

Failure to Honor Resident's Care Preferences and Dignity

Purdy Station, New York Survey Completed on 06-04-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to honor a resident's right to self-determination and dignity by not supporting their expressed preference to avoid care from a specific Certified Nurse Aide (CNA). The resident, who had intact cognition and required total assistance with activities of daily living due to multiple medical diagnoses, filed a grievance in January 2025 stating that some CNAs, particularly one, were too strong and manhandled them, causing discomfort due to sensitive legs. Despite this grievance and repeated verbal complaints to facility leadership, there was no documented evidence that the resident's care plan was updated to reflect their preference to not receive care from the identified CNA. The CNA in question subsequently provided care to the resident, waking them early in the morning and performing care after the resident refused, which the resident again described as manhandling. Interviews with facility staff, including the Director of Nursing (DON), Administrator, and Director of Social Services, confirmed awareness of the resident's complaints and preference. However, the DON admitted that instructions to avoid assigning the CNA to the resident were given verbally and not documented in the care plan or communicated through the Kardex Care Guide. The facility's policy required care to be provided with resident consent and according to the care plan, but the lack of documentation and communication led to the resident's preferences not being honored, resulting in the deficiency.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙