Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0756
E

Failure to Review and Document Physician Response to Pharmacist Medication Recommendations

Alamogordo, New Mexico Survey Completed on 06-05-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that consultant pharmacist recommendations regarding drug regimen reviews were reviewed and implemented by the attending physician, or that the physician provided documentation of a rationale for not following the pharmacist's recommendations. This deficiency was identified for three out of seven residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. In each case, the pharmacist had made specific recommendations, such as considering gradual dose reductions (GDR) for psychotropic medications, but there was no evidence in the medical records that the physician responded to or documented a clinical rationale for declining these recommendations. For one resident with a diagnosis of recurrent depressive disorders, the pharmacist recommended a GDR for fluoxetine (Prozac), but the physician did not implement the recommendation or document a reason for not doing so. The medication administration record showed that the resident continued to receive the medication as originally ordered, and the physician response section on the pharmacist's form was left blank. Another resident with depression, seizures, and traumatic brain injury had a recent fall, and the pharmacist noted that the resident's medications could increase fall risk, asking if the physician would like to make any changes and to provide a clinical rationale. The physician only documented that the resident was stable on the medications, without specifically addressing the pharmacist's recommendations or providing a detailed rationale. A third resident with dementia and depressive disorders had multiple psychotropic medications for which GDRs were recommended and declined, but the physician did not document any rationale in the medical record for not following the pharmacist's recommendations.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙