Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0677
D

Deficient Incontinence Care Due to Use of Double Briefs

Ocean Grove, New Jersey Survey Completed on 07-24-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Surveyors identified a deficiency in incontinence care during rounds on one of two nursing units, where two residents who were dependent on staff for activities of daily living were found to be wearing double incontinence briefs. In both cases, a staff member exposed the front of the resident's brief, which was wet, and upon further inspection, a second, also wet, incontinence brief was discovered layered underneath. The staff member present acknowledged that applying two briefs was not appropriate. Both residents had significant medical histories, including congestive heart failure, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and acute respiratory failure, and were assessed as always or frequently incontinent and dependent on staff for toileting hygiene. The medical records and individualized care plans for these residents documented their incontinence and dependence on staff, but one care plan did not include specific interventions for incontinence. The facility's policy on incontinence care required appropriate treatment to prevent infections and restore continence to the extent possible. The surveyor confirmed with facility staff and policy that the use of double briefs was not acceptable practice, and the deficiency was cited based on these observations and record reviews.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙