Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
D

Inaccurate MDS Coding for Two Residents

Bloomingdale, New Jersey Survey Completed on 08-28-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for two residents, resulting in deficiencies related to the management of care. For one resident, observations revealed signage and personal protective equipment indicating Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) due to a history of multiple drug-resistant organisms (MDRO) in the urine. The resident's care plan documented EBP for MDRO and insulin therapy for diabetes, and the Medication Administration Record showed insulin administration during the assessment period. However, the quarterly MDS did not reflect the resident's history of MDRO or insulin use in the relevant sections. For another resident, a review of the medical record and care plan indicated a diagnosis of hypertensive heart disease and dementia, with a severely impaired cognitive status. The admission MDS documented no falls in the 2-6 months prior to admission, but the baseline care plan and other documentation noted a fall in the relevant period as reported by the resident's daughter. Additional assessments identified the resident as being at risk for falls due to an unsteady gait. The discrepancies between the MDS coding and supporting documentation contributed to the deficiency.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙