Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0627
D

Failure to Document Resident Choice in Discharge Planning

Las Vegas, Nevada Survey Completed on 07-23-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that a resident was appropriately discharged in accordance with their needs and preferences. The resident, who had diagnoses including spondylosis, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypothyroidism, and hypertension, was admitted with a care plan that required coordinated discharge planning to their home with family. The facility was responsible for assisting the resident and their support person in locating and coordinating post-discharge services, such as home health care, durable medical equipment, oxygen, prescriptions, and other support services. However, documentation revealed that the facility did not provide evidence that the resident was presented with options or assisted in choosing a post-acute care provider that best suited their goals, preferences, needs, and circumstances. Interviews with facility staff indicated that while a form existed for residents to select the facility's preferred home health agency, there was no documented evidence that the resident in question was given a choice or presented with alternative providers. Other residents had signed referral forms for the facility's home health agency, but some did not recall signing them, and the facility did not maintain a list of home health agency providers to offer as options. The Director of Nursing and the Administrator both acknowledged that documentation of discharge planning discussions and options provided was lacking or not consistently recorded in the resident's notes.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙