Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0640
E

Failure to Submit MDS Assessments Within Required Timeframe

Holdrege, Nebraska Survey Completed on 08-05-2025

Penalty

18 days payment denial
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that all Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for residents were submitted to the State within the required 14-day period after completion. This deficiency affected all seven residents sampled, as their MDS data was either finalized but not transmitted or submitted but not reviewed and accepted within the mandated timeframe. The facility's policy requires timely and accurate completion and submission of MDS assessments in compliance with federal and state regulations, with oversight by the MDS Coordinator and the interdisciplinary team. However, due to the MDS Coordinator's frequent absences and being the sole individual responsible for MDS data, the submission process was delayed, and no other staff monitored or managed the workload in the Coordinator's absence. Record reviews confirmed that for each of the seven residents sampled, the MDS data was either finalized but not sent or was in a production batch that had not been reviewed and accepted within the required period. Interviews with the MDS Coordinator corroborated that the assessments were not submitted on time, and there was no backup process in place to ensure timely submission during the Coordinator's absence. The facility census at the time was 73 residents, and the deficiency was identified through both record review and staff interviews.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙