Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0689
G

Failure to Prevent Elopement and Ensure Resident Safety

Glendive, Montana Survey Completed on 06-19-2025

Penalty

Fine: $15,935
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A resident with dementia, identified as being at risk for elopement and wandering, exited the facility through the front doors and left the property unsupervised. The resident was able to access a public road and was later found by police at a nearby apartment complex, having sustained a laceration to the forehead after a fall. The incident was reported to the State Survey Agency, and the resident required hospital evaluation and observation for the injuries sustained during the elopement. Facility records indicate that the resident had a history of wandering behaviors, including previous incidents where the resident attempted to leave the facility or triggered door alarms. The resident had been assessed as at risk for elopement and had a wander guard device placed. Despite these interventions, the resident was able to exit the facility undetected. On the day of the incident, a staff member responded to the front door alarm, briefly scanned the perimeter, but did not see any residents outside and did not conduct a head count as required by facility policy. Interviews with staff revealed gaps in training and adherence to elopement protocols. The staff member who responded to the alarm had not read the facility's elopement policy and was not fully oriented to the procedures. Facility policy required a full head count and further action if a resident could not be located, but these steps were not followed. Documentation and communication with law enforcement regarding the incident were incomplete at the time of the survey.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙