Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0604
E

Failure to Assess and Document Use of Restraints and Assistive Devices

Ennis, Montana Survey Completed on 05-08-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to perform and document complete resident assessments prior to the use of physical restraints or assistive devices that could be considered restraints for several residents. In one case, a resident with left-sided paralysis and limited hand mobility had upper bed rails in place, which he could not lower independently. Staff and the resident indicated the bed rails were used to prevent falls and assist with mobility, but documentation did not show whether the bed rails met the criteria for a restraint or if risks and benefits were discussed with the resident or representative. The assessments also failed to indicate if the resident could remove the bed rails independently, despite staff statements that the rails restricted his ability to get out of bed. Another resident was observed using a scoop mattress, which she stated did not restrict her movement and was used to assist with transfers and positioning due to poor core control. However, the facility did not complete or document an assessment prior to the initial use of the scoop mattress, nor did they provide ongoing monitoring of its use. The evaluation on file did not address whether the scoop mattress limited the resident's freedom of movement, and there was inconsistency in the documentation regarding whether it was considered a restraint. A third resident was observed with bed rails in the up position, which she stated helped prevent her from falling out of bed. Staff confirmed the bed rails were used for safety, and the resident was able to get out of bed independently. However, there was a lack of documented Assistive Device/Restraint Evaluations for an extended period, indicating a failure to perform ongoing monitoring of the use of bed rails as required. The facility's policy defined restraints based on the resident's ability to remove the device and its impact on freedom of movement, but the required assessments and documentation were incomplete or missing for the residents involved.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙