Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0677
D

Failure to Provide Meal Assistance to Resident Requiring Support

Kalispell, Montana Survey Completed on 07-17-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Facility staff failed to provide necessary assistance with meals to a resident identified as requiring encouragement and one-on-one support for eating. Multiple observations showed the resident's meal trays were left covered and out of reach, both while the resident was in bed and seated in a Broda chair. On several occasions, staff members were present but did not offer assistance, encouragement, or alternatives before removing untouched meal trays. Interviews with staff revealed inconsistent understanding of the resident's needs, with some staff stating the resident could feed himself, while others acknowledged he required encouragement and occasional one-on-one help. Staff also cited the resident's comfort care status as a reason for not assisting with meals, despite the care plan indicating interventions such as encouragement to eat and offering substitutes or supplements if intake was low. The resident was noted to have severe weight loss and was being monitored in nutrition at risk meetings. The care plan specifically outlined goals and interventions to address nutritional needs, including ensuring the resident consumed more than 50% of meals and providing alternatives if intake was insufficient. Despite these documented needs and interventions, staff did not consistently implement the care plan, resulting in the resident not receiving necessary care and services related to meal assistance.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙