Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0578
E

Inconsistent and Incomplete Advance Directive Documentation

Libby, Montana Survey Completed on 06-30-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that advance directives and code status documentation were complete, accurate, and consistent with the residents' wishes and the electronic health record (EHR) for three of twenty sampled residents. In one case, a resident expressed a clear refusal of any tubes for care, including catheters and feeding tubes, yet the EHR listed the resident as full code with full treatment, and the available POLST forms were inconsistent and not properly signed by a physician. One POLST was not on file in the EHR, and no verbal physician order was documented to support the code status. For another resident, the POLST indicated a do not resuscitate status, but the required signature of the patient or decision maker was only documented as a verbal order without a follow-up physician signature. In a third case, the POLST and EHR code status did not match, and the POLST lacked a physician signature, with no verbal physician order found in the EHR. Staff interviews revealed that unsigned POLST forms were entered into the electronic record before being properly signed, contrary to facility policy and POLST instructions, which require patient or legal decision maker signatures and provider follow-up for verbal orders.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙