Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0657
E

Failure to Individualize and Update Activity Care Plans

Great Falls, Montana Survey Completed on 06-19-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to review and revise comprehensive care plans to accurately reflect the activity and food preferences of five residents. For each of these residents, the care plans either lacked documentation of specific activity interests or, in one case, did not include an activity plan at all. Direct interviews and observations revealed that residents participated in limited or no activities beyond what was documented, and their stated preferences or interests were not reflected in their care plans. For example, one resident attended only bible study and no other activities, while another was left at a dining table without engagement or refreshments. Another resident's family member reported that her loved one enjoyed social activities such as bowling and sewing, but these preferences were not documented or acted upon in the care plan. Staff interviews indicated a lack of awareness regarding the need to individualize and document resident preferences in the care plans, especially for those unable to attend resident council meetings. The facility's own policy requires that resident interests, hobbies, and cultural preferences be incorporated into the care plan following assessment, but this was not consistently done. The deficiency was identified through a combination of record reviews, resident and staff interviews, and direct observation.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙