Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0838
C

Failure to Update Facility-Wide Assessment and Resource Planning

Sedalia, Missouri Survey Completed on 06-09-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Facility staff failed to update the Facility-Wide Assessment, which is required to determine the necessary resources for competent resident care during both routine operations and emergencies. The assessment tool, last dated 9/13/24, was missing critical information, including the names of persons involved in completing the assessment, dates of review with the QAA/QAPI committee, and accurate data on resident census, acuity levels, special treatments, ADL assistance needs, mobility, and the average daily staffing plan. These omissions meant the assessment did not accurately reflect the facility's current resident population or resource needs. Interviews with the DON and interim administrator revealed confusion regarding responsibilities for updating the assessment and the frequency with which updates should occur. The DON believed the administrator was responsible for updating the census and was unsure if the administrator knew how often the assessment should be updated. The interim administrator confirmed that the assessment should be updated annually and as needed, such as with changes in administration, DON, staffing requirements, resident acuity, or census, but could not explain why this had not been done.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙